IRAC Method Analysis Essay Sample

IRAC Method for Legal Writing The IRAC method that is commonly used for legal writing, helps break down fact patterns, complex terminology, and complicated legal analysis into easy to understand blocks of text. Generally, IRAC format is used in bar exams and law school for solving hypothetical questions. This method can also be useful for summarizing legal opinion and preparing a case brief that short summary of the usual formal court opinion. Such documents can be prepared when doing legal research, preparing for a bar exam, or explaining a court case to other people. When writing legal documents, it is possible to follow a good IRAC method example that will make things easier. The IRAC method is widely used by writing instructor, law students, and lawyers as a useful method of answering complicated legal questions. IRAC Components IRAC is an acronym where the letters stand for the following four words: Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion. The Issue is the main legal question or statement. In this section, it is crucial to define exactly the law question which is usually made in the form of ‘Whetherwhen’. The Rule section is the statement of appropriate rules relating directly to deciding the issue. The Application (Analysis) section uses the rules which were stated in the rules section for analysis the case. Conclusion section answers the question that was formulated in the issue section. The Facts are very important for every step when using the method and determine it how the process of the reasoning should be developed. The IRAC methodology helps reduce legal reasoning on the complicated issues and organize the legal analysis more efficiently. The IRAC methods reduce errors in legal reasoning as well. So to apply IRAC methodology for solving a hypothetical question at law exam, we should follow certain steps: Identify every issue which is in the hypothetical pattern. Find appropriate legal rules that are relevant to every issue and make a statement of rules. Provide explanation how rules should be used and analyze the facts. Make a conclusion on how every issue may be resolved. More free time? Better grade? Click on this button nowOrder Now When using this method, it is necessary to demonstrate the reasoning that was used for making a conclusion. IRAC Method Example King Ltd is a manufacturer of chemical goods. It signed a contract with Bing Ltd a large discount retailer. According to the contract, King Ltd was to supply the manufactured goods exclusively to Bing Ltd. Later, the directors of Bing Ltd discover that there is a wholly-owned subsidiary of King Ltd which sells identical chemical goods to competitors at cheaper prices. It turned out that the subsidiary was included to enable King Ltd to avoid the consequences of the contract with Bing Ltd. Provide advice for the directors. Issue: The main legal question is whether it is possible here to pierce the corporate veil. Rule: The legal principle that should be applied, established in Malodans case is that a company is an independent legal identity from its members and directors. But there are exceptions when it is possible to pierce the corporate veil. In the case of Buildnord Lotor Co Ltd v Borne, it was decided that the corporate veil can be pierced if a wholly owned subsidiary was made by a company to avoid a legal obligation. Application: In this case, King Ltd organized the subsidiary company to avoid its obligations under the contract to supply its chemical goods exclusively to Bing Ltd. Conclusion: The directors can ask the court to pierce the veil of the wholly-owned subsidiary of King Ltd and sue King Ltd for the break of contract.